The National Association of Broadcasters is urging the Federal Communications Commission to apply fairness and clarity in its proposed rules aimed at scrutinizing foreign involvement in U.S. broadcast station ownership. In a new filing, the NAB said it supports national security safeguards but warned that the FCC’s “foreign adversary” review plan could unfairly burden domestic broadcasters if not carefully implemented.
The FCC is developing new procedures that would require more detailed disclosures and possible review of investment ties to countries deemed foreign adversaries, including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. The rules are intended to enforce a 2023 congressional mandate directing the agency to vet broadcast licenses for potential foreign influence.
NAB acknowledged the importance of national security but argued the proposed framework lacks specificity, leaving broadcasters vulnerable to uncertain enforcement or procedural delays. “Broadcasters should not be subject to unnecessary burdens or ambiguous compliance expectations simply because of passive investment structures,” the NAB said in its comments.
The association also called on the FCC to ensure that broadcasters have a clear and fair opportunity to respond to any concerns raised during the review process. NAB expressed concern that minor or indirect ties could trigger disproportionate scrutiny, especially in an industry already under economic pressure.
The FCC’s proposed plan includes heightened disclosures during license applications and renewals, and possible revocation if connections to foreign adversaries are found. Broadcasters fear that the broad scope of what constitutes “foreign ownership” could lead to overreach and unintended consequences for stations with complex ownership structures involving mutual funds, pension investments, or other passive stakeholders.
NAB asked the FCC to focus on material influence, not just financial ties, and to avoid one-size-fits-all assessments. It also encouraged the commission to consider input from broadcasters in shaping final procedures and enforcement timelines.
The rulemaking remains open for public comment, and the FCC has not indicated when it plans to finalize the guidelines. Broadcasters, telecom operators, and public interest groups are all expected to weigh in before the next phase of regulatory drafting begins.